Learn to Love

If you want to start love successfully

you must learn

manners

and . . . . . to be patient

*
You can visit my other blog by clicking on the following URL or writing it in your browser
What Am I ? - - http://pkblogs.com/iftikharajmal - - میں کیا ہوں

Religious Hypocrisy

Buddhist Nuns veil themselves. No one calls it sexist. It is seen as their devotion to God.














Christian Nuns veil themselves. No one calls it sexist. It is seen as their devotion to God.













When Muslim Girls and Women veil themselves, why is it seen as Rebellion, Oppression, Treason, Extremism, Ignorance, Sexism and everything but Devotion to God!

Muslims are the only ones required to cover so they will be the only ones forbidden!


Courtesy: Hijab Hypocrisy

Hypocrisy of the Torch Bearers of Humanity

This is a painting of the Virgin Mary by Catholics. Notice that she is not wearing a mini-skirt. This is how they see her. But they see Muslim Women with contempt if they choose to dress like her.




















Widows often veil themselves. This is seen as admirable. It shows their devotion to their dead husbands. When a Muslim woman practices her devotion to the Almighty (who never dies) by veiling herself, it is seen as despicable.












Amish Christian ladies cover their hair and body properly. They are seen as devout. Although people might disagree with their way of life they are respected. The fact that they cover their hair does not make them a target of feminists as they do it because of their devotion to God.












Religious Jewish women cover their hair with a headscarf or a wig. There are no plans in any country to ban or restrict their right to do so. Their religion orders them to do it and they are allowed to do it to please their Creator unhindered.












Why are Muslim women seen as oppressed? Is there any difference between the cloth that covers their heads and what covers so many others?
Why are girls not allowed to cover hair in France for religious reasons but are allowed for Fashion?
How will a school tell if a girl is covering for religion.



Courtesy: Hijab Hypocrisy

Hypocrisy in France and Germany

A Nun covers her hair. The Bible orders it at Corinthians, Chap 11 verses 3-10. She is allowed to teach in German Schools








A Muslim lady covers her hair. The Quran orders it at 7:26, 24:31, 33:59. She is banned from teaching in German Schools.



















Religious! Allowed! A Bride wears a Veil she is seen as dignified. She is allowed to get married in French registry offices.














Oppressed! Banned! A Muslim Girl wears a Veil. She is labeled Oppressed. She is banned from getting married in French registry offices.

Courtesy: Hijab Hypocrisy

Fantastic Hotels

Double Faced-ness of the West

The Western world keeps on shouting loud that they are for freedom of speech. Was this not said by all the Western governments when blasphemous cartoons were published by newspapers in their countries?

Recently, France has passed a law under which saying that Turks did not commit massacre of 1.5 million Armenians during 1915 – 1917 AD, is a punishable crime. Forgetting what are the facts (which may be otherwise), is this law not banning freedom of speech and for a matter which has no written records?

Not agreeing that Adolph Hitler committed holocaust by killing 6 million Jews in gas chambers is already a punishable crime for which some persons had been punished and are behind the bars.

Perusal of past history reveals that they have always been bent upon discovering fault in their opponents, especially, Muslims. When somebody speaks in favour of the atrocities and mass murders committed by the West, it is democracy and freedom of speech otherwise it is a crime.

Would it not have been appropriate for Paris to examine its own horrible atrocities perpetrated upon the Algerian Muslims during their war of liberation from French rule in the 1950s? Similarly, the genocide of the Bosnian and Kosovar Muslims by the Serbs in the 1990s is yet another subject needing a sympathetic consideration by the international community.Stalin regime in the Soviet Union during early 1930s had murdered 7 million Ukrainians and sent 2 million to concentration camps which swell to 5.5 million by the end of World War II.

What about genocide of 2 million Soviet Muslims, including Bashkirs, Chechens, Crimeans, Ingush, Kazakhs, Tajiks and Tatars. In addition to these, was the killing of 2 million ethnic Germans, mainly consisting of women and children as well as the violent expulsion of 15 million more Germans molesting 2 million girls and women.
Why American forces killed one million Vietnamese from 1965 to 1973?

Moscow’s occupation of Afghanistan in 1979 caused death and injuries to two million Afghans and drove 5 million into Pakistan and Iran.

What about dropping nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by USA mass killing of over 200,000 Japanese civilians, and destroying and occupying Iraq Afghanistan killing hundreds of thousands civilians.

What Israel has been doing in the Middle East (with support from USA) and India in Jammu Kashmir for the last six decades and their military men raping women not sparing minor girls of 10 years and old women of 70 years?
Was it all democracy and act of human love? Could there be worst Hypocrisy than this?

Progress ? ? ?

While searching for something on the web, I came across Transparency International’s recent report which was published on August 11, 2006. It has some interesting data to ponder.

Increase in Corruption During various Governments

Benazir . . . . . . . . . . 1988 – 1990 = 8 %
Nawaz Sharif . . . . . 1990 – 1993 = 10 %
Benazir . . . . . . . . . . 1993 – 1996 = 48 %
Nawaz Sharif . . . . . 1996 – 1999 = 34 %
Pervez Musharraf . .1999 – 2002 = 32.69 %
Pervez Musharraf 2002 – 2006 = 67.31 %

Present Mutual Corruption Rating of Provinces

Punjab . . . . . . = 42.7 %
Sindh . . . . . . . = 28.7 %
Balochistan . = 15.1 %
NWFP . . . . . .= 13.5 %

Order of Corruption in 2002 and 2006
Most corrupt at top and least corrupt at bottom
It will be seen that Judiciary and Land department have excelled in corruption.

Year 2002 . . . . Year 2006

Police . . . . . . . . Police
Power . . . . . . . . Power
Taxation . . . . . . Judiciary
Judiciary . . . . . Land
Custom . . . . . . . Taxation
Health . . . . . . . . Custom
Land . . . . . . . . . Health
Education . . . . . Education
Railway . . . . . . . Railway
Bank . . . . . . . . . Bank

Present Mutual Corruption Rating of Institutions
Not-at-all-corrupt gets zero. Score 4 means extremely corrupt.

Institution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Score

Political Parties . . . . . . . . . 3.0 = 75.0 %
Parliament/Legislature . . 2.7 = 67.5 %
Police . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.6 = 65.0 %
Legal System/Judiciary . 2.5 = 62.5 %
Business/Private Sector . . 2.4 = 60.0 %
Tax Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4 = 60.0 %
Customs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3 = 57.5 %
Media . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2 = 55.0 %
Medical Services . . . . . . . . 2.2 = 55.0 %
Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 = 50.0 %
Education System . . . . . . . 2.0 = 50.0 %
Military . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.9 = 47.5 %
Registry & Permit Services 1.9 = 47.5 %
N G Os . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.8 = 45.0 %
Religious bodies . . . . . . . 1.6 = 40.0 %